[PDF] Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative | Semantic Scholar (2024)

Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Semantic ScholarSemantic Scholar's Logo
@article{Anderson2000NullHT, title={Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative}, author={David R. Anderson and Kenneth P. Burnham and William L. Thompson}, journal={Journal of Wildlife Management}, year={2000}, volume={64}, pages={912-923}, url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:8392679}}
  • David R. Anderson, K. Burnham, W. Thompson
  • Published 1 October 2000
  • Environmental Science
  • Journal of Wildlife Management

It is found that null hypothesis testing is uninformative when no estimates of means or effect size and their precision are given, and an alternative paradigm of data analysis based on Kullback-Leibler information is described.

1,866 Citations

Highly Influential Citations

124

Background Citations

354

Methods Citations

622

Results Citations

19

Figures and Tables from this paper

  • figure 1
  • table 1
  • table 2
  • table 3

1,866 Citations

Impact of Criticism of Null‐Hypothesis Significance Testing on Statistical Reporting Practices in Conservation Biology

Overall, results of the survey show some improvements in statistical practice, but further efforts are clearly required to move the discipline toward improved practices.

  • 134
  • PDF
THE ROLE OF HYPOTHESIS TESTING IN WILDLIFE SCIENCE
    Douglas H. Johnson

    Environmental Science, Biology

  • 2002

It is suggested that consistent results from truly replicated studies will advance the understanding of the natural world, and that significance testing and resulting P-values frequently are confused with issues of replication.

  • 66
  • PDF
On the Past and Future of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
    D. RobinsonH. Wainer

    Biology, Environmental Science

  • 2002

It is suggested that the historical use of null hypothesis significance testing was reasonable and that current users might spend time profitably reading some of Fisher's applied work, but modifications to NHST, and to the interpretations of its outcomes, might better suit the needs of modern science.

  • 79
  • Highly Influenced
  • PDF
Inference without significance: measuring support for hypotheses rather than rejecting them
    T. Gerrodette

    Environmental Science

  • 2011

Inference based on significance testing is compared with model-based, likelihood and Bayesian inference using data on an endangered porpoise, Phocoena sinus, to find alternatives that lead to greater understanding and improved inference.

  • 51
  • PDF
ON THE PAST AND FUTURE OF NULL HYPOTHESIS SIGNIFICANCE TESTING1
    D. RobinsonH. Wainer

    Environmental Science

  • 2001

Criticisms of null hypothesis significance testing (NHST) have appeared recently in wildlife research journals (Anderson, Burnham, & Thompson, 2000; Anderson, Link, Johnson, & Burnham, 2001; Cherry,

  • 10
Variation, Use, and Misuse of Statistical Models: A Review of the Effects on the Interpretation of Research Results
    Y. Wiersma

    Environmental Science

  • 2011

This chapter suggests that the field of predictive habitat modeling evolved somewhat separately within the sub-disciplines of theoretical ecology, wildlife management, and landscape ecology due to slightly different worldviews, cultures, and research applications within each subfield.

  • 4
THE INFORMATION-THEORETIC APPROACH TO MODEL SELECTION: DESCRIPTION AND CASE STUDY
    Erin E. BlankenshipaMicah W PerkinsbR. J. Johnsonc

    Environmental Science

  • 2002

In the wildlife literature there has becn some recent criticism of statistical significance testing. In the past few years, both the Journal of ·Wildlife :vIanagement and the Wildlife Society

  • 3
  • PDF
the Ecological Society of America In defense of P values
    P. Murtaugh

    Environmental Science

  • 2014

Statistical hypothesis testing has been widely criticized by ecologists in recent years. I review some of the more persistent criticisms of P values and argue that most stem from misunderstandings or

Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results
    J. Wilson WhiteA. RassweilerJ. SamhouriA. StierC. White

    Environmental Science

  • 2014

This article argues that modelers should abandon frequentist statistical hypothesis tests applied to simulation model output as a misuse of statistical theory, and encourages instead a focus on the magnitude of differences between simulations.

  • 330
  • PDF
Final Collapse of the Neyman-Pearson Decision Theoretic Framework and Rise of the neoFisherian
    S. HurlbertCelia M. Lombardi

    Mathematics, Environmental Science

  • 2009

This essay grew out of an examination of one-tailed significance testing. One-tailed tests were little advocated by the founders of modern statistics but are widely used and recommended nowadays in

  • 261
  • PDF

...

...

60 References

The Insignificance of Statistical Significance Testing
    Douglas H. Johnson

    Biology, Environmental Science

  • 1999

This paper describes how statistical hypothesis tests are often viewed, and then contrasts that interpretation with the correct one, and discusses the arbitrariness of P-values, conclusions that the null hypothesis is true, power analysis, and distinctions between statistical and biological significance.

  • 1,073
  • PDF
p values, hypothesis tests, and likelihood: implications for epidemiology of a neglected historical debate.
    S. Goodman

    History, Medicine

    American journal of epidemiology

  • 1993

An analysis using another method promoted by Fisher, mathematical likelihood, shows that the p value substantially overstates the evidence against the null hypothesis.

  • 262
  • PDF
AN INTRODUCTION TO BAYESIAN INFERENCE FOR ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND ENVIRONMENTAL
    A. Ellison

    Environmental Science

  • 1996

It is argued that a "Bayesian ecology" would make better use of pre-existing data; allow stronger conclusions to be drawn from large-scale experiments with few replicates; and be more relevant to environmental decision-making.

  • 455
  • PDF
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
    J. BergerT. Sellke

    Mathematics

  • 1987

Abstract The problem of testing a point null hypothesis (or a “small interval” null hypothesis) is considered. Of interest is the relationship between the P value (or observed significance level) and

  • 1,014
  • PDF
ON THE USE AND INTERPRETATION OF CERTAIN TEST CRITERIA FOR PURPOSES OF STATISTICAL INFERENCE PART I
    J. NeymanE. S. Pearson

    Mathematics

  • 1928

In an earlier paper* we have endeavoured to emphasise the importance of placing in a logical sequence the stages of reasoning adopted in the solution of certain statistical problems, which may be

  • 1,006
  • PDF
Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing.
    M. GardnerD. Altman

    Medicine

    British medical journal

  • 1986

Some methods of calculating confidence intervals for means and differences between means are given, with similar information for proportions, and the paper also gives suggestions for graphical display.

  • 1,906
  • PDF
Selection Models and the File Drawer Problem
    S. IyengarJ. Greenhouse

    Biology

  • 1988

This paper uses selection models, or weighted distributions, to deal with one source of bias, namely the failure to report studies that do not yield statistically significant results, and applies selection models to two approaches that have been suggested for correcting the bias.

  • 366
  • PDF
The earth is round (p < .05)

After 4 decades of severe criticism, the ritual of null hypothesis significance testing (mechanical dichotomous decisions around a sacred .05 criterion) still persists. This article reviews the

  • 3,980
  • PDF
A new look at the statistical model identification
    H. Akaike

    Mathematics

  • 1974

The history of the development of statistical hypothesis testing in time series analysis is reviewed briefly and it is pointed out that the hypothesis testing procedure is not adequately defined as

  • 47,278
  • PDF
The Use of Predicted Confidence Intervals When Planning Experiments and the Misuse of Power When Interpreting Results
    S. GoodmanJ. Berlin

    Medicine

    Annals of Internal Medicine

  • 1994

The problems with the framework of statistical power are elucidated in the course of explaining why post hoc estimates of power are of little help in interpreting results and why the focus of attention should be exclusively on confidence intervals.

  • 600

...

...

Related Papers

Showing 1 through 3 of 0 Related Papers

    [PDF] Null Hypothesis Testing: Problems, Prevalence, and an Alternative | Semantic Scholar (2024)

    FAQs

    What is an example of a null hypothesis and an alternative hypothesis? ›

    Examples: Null Hypothesis: H0: There is no difference in the salary of factory workers based on gender. Alternative Hypothesis: Ha: Male factory workers have a higher salary than female factory workers. Null Hypothesis: H0: There is no relationship between height and shoe size.

    How do you solve for null and alternative hypothesis? ›

    The general procedure for testing the null hypothesis is as follows:
    1. State the null and alternative hypotheses.
    2. Specify α and the sample size.
    3. Select an appropriate statistical test.
    4. Collect data (note that the previous steps should be done before collecting data)
    5. Compute the test statistic based on the sample data.

    What is the null hypothesis pdf? ›

    A null hypothesis is a statistical hypothesis in which there is no significant difference exist between the. set of variables. It is the original or default statement, with no effect, often represented by H0 (H-zero).

    What is the null hypothesis for prevalence study? ›

    The statement being tested in a test of statistical significance is called the null hypothesis. The test of significance is designed to assess the strength of the evidence against the null hypothesis, or a statement of 'no effect' or 'no difference'. It is often symbolized as H0.

    What is null and alternative hypothesis for dummies? ›

    The null hypothesis is often stated as the assumption that there is no change, no difference between two groups, or no relationship between two variables. The alternative hypothesis, on the other hand, is the statement that there is a change, difference, or relationship.

    How do you know if a hypothesis is null or alternative? ›

    The null hypothesis is the statement or claim being made (which we are trying to disprove) and the alternative hypothesis is the hypothesis that we are trying to prove and which is accepted if we have sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis.

    What are the rules for null and alternative hypothesis? ›

    The null statement must always contain some form of equality (=, ≤ or ≥) Always write the alternative hypothesis, typically denoted with H a or H 1, using less than, greater than, or not equals symbols, i.e., (≠, >, or <).

    What is the best description and example of the null hypothesis in a hypothesis test? ›

    The null hypothesis assumes that any kind of difference between the chosen characteristics that you see in a set of data is due to chance. For example, if the expected earnings for the gambling game are truly equal to zero, then any difference between the average earnings in the data and zero is due to chance.

    How do you conclude a null and alternative hypothesis? ›

    The conclusion is made up of two parts: 1) Reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis, and 2) there is or is not enough evidence to support the alternative claim. Option 1) Reject the null hypothesis (H0). This means that you have enough statistical evidence to support the alternative claim (H1).

    What is null hypothesis in simple words? ›

    A null hypothesis is a hypothesis that says there is no statistical significance between the two variables. It is usually the hypothesis a researcher or experimenter will try to disprove or discredit. An alternative hypothesis is one that states there is a statistically significant relationship between two variables.

    What is the null hypothesis in a nutshell? ›

    The null hypothesis states that there's no statistical significance in the observed effect, while the alternative hypothesis states that there's a significant effect. 2. Choose the significance level (alpha): Usually set at 0.05, this represents the probability of rejecting the null hypothesis when it's true. 3.

    How to determine if a difference is statistically significant? ›

    A study is statistically significant if the P value is less than the pre-specified alpha. Stated succinctly: A P value less than a predetermined alpha is considered a statistically significant result. A P value greater than or equal to alpha is not a statistically significant result.

    Which test is used for prevalence? ›

    The significance of distributions within parts of a large-area prevalence study can be evaluated by an adaptation of the chi-square contingency test: χ2 = Σ (O-E) 2 E where O = observed number of cases in each part , E = the expected number of cases in the same part .

    How to calculate prevalence? ›

    For a representative sample, prevalence is the number of people in the sample with the characteristic of interest, divided by the total number of people in the sample.

    What is an example of prevalence? ›

    The number of cases of a disease, number of infected people, or number of people with some other attribute present during a particular interval of time. It is often expressed as a rate (for example, the prevalence of diabetes per 1,000 people during a year).

    What is an example of a null and alternative hypothesis in biology? ›

    For example, perhaps you are interested in comparing the mean body size of two species of lizards, an anole and a gecko. Our null hypothesis would be that the two species do not differ in body size. The alternative, which one can conclude by rejecting that null hypothesis, is that one species is larger than the other.

    How to write H0 and H1 hypothesis? ›

    If it uses words such as “less, decreased, smaller and so on”, apply “<” for H1. If words such as “the same, change, different/difference and so on” appear in the claim, use “≠” for H1. The opposite symbol will be used for H0. (Note: For MATH 1257, always use “=” for H0.)

    How to write a hypothesis example? ›

    A simple hypothesis suggests only the relationship between two variables: one independent and one dependent. Examples: If you stay up late, then you feel tired the next day. Turning off your phone makes it charge faster.

    Which is an example of a null hypothesis quizlet? ›

    For example, let's say you think that a certain drug might be responsible for a spate of recent heart attacks. The drug company thinks the drug is safe. The null hypothesis is always the accepted hypothesis; in this example, the drug is on the market, people are using it, and it's generally accepted to be safe.

    References

    Top Articles
    Latest Posts
    Article information

    Author: Catherine Tremblay

    Last Updated:

    Views: 6156

    Rating: 4.7 / 5 (47 voted)

    Reviews: 86% of readers found this page helpful

    Author information

    Name: Catherine Tremblay

    Birthday: 1999-09-23

    Address: Suite 461 73643 Sherril Loaf, Dickinsonland, AZ 47941-2379

    Phone: +2678139151039

    Job: International Administration Supervisor

    Hobby: Dowsing, Snowboarding, Rowing, Beekeeping, Calligraphy, Shooting, Air sports

    Introduction: My name is Catherine Tremblay, I am a precious, perfect, tasty, enthusiastic, inexpensive, vast, kind person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.